How does your leader really rank?
Every national leader, scored across nine dimensions of power — from economy and diplomacy to crisis management and defense. Compare current form against the legacy they'll leave behind, and see who's really delivering.
No data
No expert-survey data available.
The story
Mohamed Younis A Menfi, President of Libya, is rated 39 (lower tier) on NationsHelm's Leadership scale. Their standout dimension is Crisis Response (81/100). In global media, their Communication signal reads 45/100 (high confidence), tracked from GDELT. The pressure to watch: Governance Accountability — Institutional Integrity score of 21 reflects persistent accountability pressures that constrain institutional effectiveness.
Downloadable NationsHelm cards for each signal in this dossier.
Favourability of media coverage over the tenure (GDELT tenure-mean tone), cross-leader percentile
Media volume (GDELT tenure-median daily coverage) percentile, gated down when coverage is hostile
Does tone / approval hold up when attention spikes vs. calmer periods (derived)
Stack this leader against any other in the NationsHelm database.
Mohamed Younis A Menfi is the President of Libya, from the independent politician.
Mohamed Younis A Menfi holds a Leadership Rating of 39 out of 100 (very weak). It is a derived blend of sourced leadership dimensions — governance, communication, diplomacy and others — never an estimate.
Mohamed Younis A Menfi's strongest leadership dimension is Crisis Response (81/100); the weakest is Politics (17/100), ranked from the leadership radar.
The main pressures are governance accountability and institutional dependency. Institutional Integrity score of 21 reflects persistent accountability pressures that constrain institutional effectiveness.
Mohamed Younis A Menfi has a Communication signal of 45/100 from GDELT media coverage and a Diplomatic Signal of 67/100 from GDELT events.
Country scores are blended with live World Bank data where available. Difficulty reflects the structural challenge of governing this nation — not the leader's individual performance.
Awaiting data
No archetype yet — not enough sourced stats to classify one. The archetype is derived from the leadership stat profile; it populates once enough dimensions are sourced.
Moderate exposure
Fared far better than comparable crises
Worst year (2022) — shock drivers
Each is a global percentile: how this year's shock compares to every country-year on record. Disaster shocks are not yet sourced (no open-licensed annual series).
Sourced from 6 mandate-years (2021–2026), 3 of 4 shock components present; damage ranked against 440 comparable crises.
How the country fared in its genuine crisis years vs. comparable crisis episodes (higher = less damage than same-severity peers); Untested when no major shock. Test severity is tracked separately as Crisis Exposure
Political coalition-building and governability
Perceived transparency and anti-corruption track record
State management and policy execution capacity
National security doctrine and defense capability
Strategic foresight and long-term reform capacity
International diplomatic events the country takes part in (GDELT Events) — country-level
Share of international interactions coded cooperative vs conflictual — country-level
Favourability of foreign coverage of the leader on diplomacy — leader-level
Distinct foreign source countries covering the leader on diplomacy — leader-level
Partial coverage: 70% of the formula's weight is currently sourced; the score renormalises over what's present. Remaining components appear as data lands.
Reach is discounted to 52% of its raw percentile because tenure-mean coverage tone skews unfavourable — hostile attention isn't credited as positive reach.
Institutional Integrity score of 21 reflects persistent accountability pressures that constrain institutional effectiveness.
Stability score of 35 indicates the system's performance is heavily dependent on this leader — a concentration risk.
Continuity & legitimacy of 6 points to a contested or fragile mandate underpinning Libya's institutions.
Economy score of 50 indicates ongoing challenges with macroeconomic management in Libya.
Contested legitimacy · High factional pressure · Low political violence
Neutral external backdrop.
WGI Political Stability & Absence of Violence
WGI Rule of Law, Government Effectiveness & Control of Corruption
V-Dem political continuity and regime legitimacy
UCDP organized-violence deaths, population-scaled and inverted — prefers the fresh current-year UCDP-CED reading, else the finalized annual GED
Fragile States Index social-cohesion pillar
3-year direction of the WGI stability score
