How does your leader really rank?
Every national leader, scored across nine dimensions of power — from economy and diplomacy to crisis management and defense. Compare current form against the legacy they'll leave behind, and see who's really delivering.
No data
No expert-survey data available.
The story
Feleti Teo, Prime Minister of Tuvalu, is rated 52 (lower tier) on NationsHelm's Leadership scale. Their standout dimension is Politics (78/100). In global media, their Communication signal reads 49/100 (high confidence), tracked from GDELT.
Downloadable NationsHelm cards for each signal in this dossier.
Favourability of media coverage over the tenure (GDELT tenure-mean tone), cross-leader percentile
Media volume (GDELT tenure-median daily coverage) percentile, gated down when coverage is hostile
Does tone / approval hold up when attention spikes vs. calmer periods (derived)
Stack this leader against any other in the NationsHelm database.
Feleti Teo is the Prime Minister of Tuvalu, with no party affiliation.
Feleti Teo holds a Leadership Rating of 52 out of 100 (weak). It is a derived blend of sourced leadership dimensions — governance, communication, diplomacy and others — never an estimate.
Feleti Teo's strongest leadership dimension is Politics (78/100); the weakest is Defense (0/100), ranked from the leadership radar.
Feleti Teo has a Communication signal of 49/100 from GDELT media coverage and a Diplomatic Signal of 45/100 from GDELT events.
Country scores are blended with live World Bank data where available. Difficulty reflects the structural challenge of governing this nation — not the leader's individual performance.
Awaiting data
No archetype yet — not enough sourced stats to classify one. The archetype is derived from the leadership stat profile; it populates once enough dimensions are sourced.
Minimal exposure
Untested
Worst year (2024) — shock drivers
Each is a global percentile: how this year's shock compares to every country-year on record. Disaster shocks are not yet sourced (no open-licensed annual series).
Sourced from 3 mandate-years (2024–2026), 3 of 4 shock components present.
Political coalition-building and governability
National security doctrine and defense capability
Strategic foresight and long-term reform capacity
International relations and multilateral negotiation
Public communication, oratory, and media presence
Economic stewardship, growth, and macro stability
International diplomatic events the country takes part in (GDELT Events) — country-level
Share of international interactions coded cooperative vs conflictual — country-level
Favourability of foreign coverage of the leader on diplomacy — leader-level
Distinct foreign source countries covering the leader on diplomacy — leader-level
Partial coverage: 70% of the formula's weight is currently sourced; the score renormalises over what's present. Remaining components appear as data lands.
Reach is discounted to 54% of its raw percentile because tenure-mean coverage tone skews unfavourable — hostile attention isn't credited as positive reach.
Awaiting data
No flagged challenges — no key dimension is below its threshold, or the sourced indicators that drive these flags aren't in yet.
No data available for this dimension.
Neutral external backdrop.
