How does your leader really rank?
Every national leader, scored across nine dimensions of power — from economy and diplomacy to crisis management and defense. Compare current form against the legacy they'll leave behind, and see who's really delivering.
No data
No expert-survey data available.
The story
Abdullah II of Jordan, Prime Minister of Jordan, is rated 53 (lower tier) on NationsHelm's Leadership scale. Their standout dimension is Economy (77/100).
Downloadable NationsHelm cards for each signal in this dossier.
Stack this leader against any other in the NationsHelm database.
Abdullah II of Jordan is a former Prime Minister of Jordan.
Abdullah II of Jordan holds a Leadership Rating of 53 out of 100 (weak), based on peak-career form. It is a derived blend of sourced leadership dimensions — governance, communication, diplomacy and others — never an estimate.
Abdullah II of Jordan's strongest leadership dimension is Economy (77/100); the weakest is Crisis Response (15/100), ranked from the leadership radar.
Abdullah II of Jordan profiles as a Technocrat — Governs through expertise, institutional capacity, and rational policy design rather than political mobilization.
Country scores are blended with live World Bank data where available. Difficulty reflects the structural challenge of governing this nation — not the leader's individual performance.
Governs through expertise, institutional capacity, and rational policy design rather than political mobilization. This profile thrives in environments where execution matters more than persuasion.
Also reads as
Defines their era through transformative economic restructuring. Vision and economy are the twin pillars, often implemented through pragmatic rather than ideological means.
Moderate exposure
Fared far worse than comparable crises
Worst year (2011) — shock drivers
Each is a global percentile: how this year's shock compares to every country-year on record. Disaster shocks are not yet sourced (no open-licensed annual series).
Sourced from 15 mandate-years (2004–2018), 3 of 4 shock components present; damage ranked against 439 comparable crises.
Economic stewardship, growth, and macro stability
How the country fared in its genuine crisis years vs. comparable crisis episodes (higher = less damage than same-severity peers); Untested when no major shock. Test severity is tracked separately as Crisis Exposure
Strategic foresight and long-term reform capacity
Political coalition-building and governability
Perceived transparency and anti-corruption track record
State management and policy execution capacity
External conditions during tenure
